Wednesday, 27 August 2025

I rebut false witness David Fernandez's unsportsmanlike statement

 IN THE SHERIFF COURT OF GRAMPIAN, HIGHLAND AND ISLANDS

AT
ABERDEEN

REBUTTAL FOR THE ACCUSED
WITNESS - David Fernandez

in
Procurator Fiscal, ABERDEEN
against
ALASTAIR PETER DOW, B.Sc.(Hons)


SCS Ref: SCS/2025-003979
Local Ref: ABE/2025-000145
PF Ref: AB25000403-001
Police Ref: PSSECR53W1224
SCRO No: S129419/83N



Date  lodged -  26th August 2025
Lodged by the accused representing himself


DOCUMENT CONTENTS  

  • TITLE PAGE
  • DOCUMENT CONTENTS

  • REBUTTAL FOR THE ACCUSED

  • PLAYER MIRAMONTES

  • SCOTSMAN HYPOCRITE

  • WITNESS STATEMENT

    • AGAINST MUSLIMS
    • MADRID BOMBING
    • AFGHANISTAN
    • KRISS DONALD R.I.P.
    • CELTIC’S LAWYER R.I.P.
    • PAKISTAN
    • PAKI FIRST MINISTER
    • PAKIS BY NAME
    • POLITICAL BASTARDS
    • SPAIN EXPELS MUSLIMS
    • UNSPORTSMANLIKE
    • THE HEART OF A PAKI
    • MUSLIMS KILL WOMEN
    • MUSLIMS KILL GAYS
    • CAUSE OF FREEDOM
    • UNRELIABLE WITNESS

REBUTTAL FOR THE ACCUSED


This document for the defence is produced to rebut the Crown witnesses David Fernandez, showing the unreliability of his witness statement to the police.


PLAYER MIRAMONTES

Señor David Fernández Miramontes (born 20 January 1976) is a Spanish former professional footballer, who spent most of his career in Scottish football.

The defence believes this former football player is the Crown’s witness because the disclosed witness statement has details which fit, such as the age (48) and the address (℅ Hamilton Police Station) in the correct locality for a once notable resident of Strathaven.

Precisely why this Spanish-Scotsman, 1-in-a-million using X in Scotland, from 100+ miles away, should be the only non-official to bear false witness against the Accused in this case is still something of a mystery.

The other witnesses are police officers and one witness is a Scottish Parliament official - whereas Fernandez doesn’t seem to be getting paid a salary to fit the Accused up on a false charge but has volunteered himself to give a statement to the police and has thereby catapulted himself into the prosecution team.

The Accused had not heard of Fernandez before his witness statement was disclosed to the defence but subsequently, doing due diligence, the defence has researched Fernandez online. 

SCOTSMAN HYPOCRITE


The defence has discovered that a few letters penned by presumably the same David Fernandez have been published in the Scotsman.

"Politicians have a right to speak and mix with crowds without the risk of violence, threats or intimidation."
                                        - David Fernandez

So wrote David Fernandez for the Scotsman published in July 2024 - just a few months after Fernandez had complained to the police about the Accused’s posts on X, which complaint of his incited the police to the violence of smashing the Accused’s Aberdeen flat door in to take the Accused political prisoner for the purpose of threatening the Accused’s freedom of expression with arrest, charge and prosecution which intimidates the Accused from doing his political and social duty of care for the people as is any citizen’s right and duty in a democratic society.

It seems that Fernandez is quite the hypocrite - on the one hand writing a letter to the Scotsman seemingly supporting democratic rights for politicians while on the other hand doing the exact opposite by complaining to the police to deny democratic rights for the Accused, a political and social activist, so that the Accused is hampered from his duties of public service.

Fernandez’s witness statement shows him to be a shameless hypocrite, a liar and a fascist-wolf in liberal-sheep's clothing, a man who is evidentially an inciter of undemocratic police state violence, threats and intimidation against someone whose views he doesn’t agree with.

WITNESS STATEMENT

“Place, date & time: Witness home address 14-04-2024 at 15:12:00
I am the above person and reside at the given address.
I first noticed posts on Twitter in March last year made by a user - Peter Dow making comments against Muslims.”
                                        - David Fernandez


AGAINST MUSLIMS

Making informed comments against Muslims is what the Accused has a duty to do but why wouldn’t Fernandez make informed comments against Muslims himself when there is good reason to do so?

MADRID BOMBING

The defence asks if Fernandez is informed about the deadliest terrorist attack on European soil this century - the 2004 Madrid train bombings when 193 people were killed by Al-Qaeda inspired terrorists?


Will Fernandez comment against the Muslim Madrid-train-bombers now?

Is Fernandez informed about the Al-Qaeda Muslim terrorist organisation claiming responsibility and inspiring the Madrid train bombings? Will he comment against Al-Qaeda Muslims now?

Is it “racist” to comment against Muslim terrorists? It’s not “racist”, is it?

AFGHANISTAN

Is Fernandez informed about Taliban Muslims killing Spanish soldiers deployed to Afghanistan with the Coalition in the hunt for the Al-Qaeda Muslim terrorists who attacked our ally, the United States of America, on September 11th (9/11) 2001?

"Of the 35 Spanish deaths," (in Afghanistan) "17 died in August 2005 when the Eurocopter Cougar helicopter they were travelling in crashed, 13 were killed in separate attacks by insurgents, two died from natural causes, and two died in vehicle accidents. Another 62 died in a 2003 Yak-42 plane crash in Turkey on their way back to Spain from Afghanistan." 

Will Fernandez comment now against Taliban Muslims killing our Coalition soldiers in Afghanistan?

"KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) - Thousands of people watched as a woman, cowering beneath a pale blue all-enveloping burqa, was shot and killed today in the first public execution of a woman in Kabul since the Taliban religious army took control three years ago.”

Is Fernandez informed that the Taliban Muslims have executed women in a sports stadium for public entertainment? Will Fernandez now comment against Taliban Muslims? Is it “racist” to comment against Taliban Muslims? It’s not “racist”, is it?

Would Fernandez comment against Muslims ever being allowed to execute Scottish women at the football grounds or other sports stadiums of Scotland?

Would Fernandez comment against the horror of Muslims ever staging a public execution of any Scot for the entertainment of a Muslim crowd? Is it “racist” to comment against Muslims executing our loved ones? It’s not “racist” is it?

KRISS DONALD R.I.P.

Is Fernandez informed about the Pakistanis who murdered Glaswegian Kriss Donald while Fernandez was a player for Celtic?

The Pakistani murderers dumped Kriss Donald’s body on the Clyde walkway behind Celtic’s Barrowfield training ground before some of the killer gang fled to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.

Will Fernandez now comment against those Pakistani gangsters who killed Kriss Donald?

Is it “racist” to comment against Pakistani gangsters? It’s not “racist”, is it?

CELTIC’S LAWYER R.I.P.

Is Fernandez informed about how Celtic’s former lawyer the late Paul McBride QC was misled by Scottish-Pakistani lawyer Aamer Anwar to visit Pakistan where he died suddenly without any subsequent public review of any independent forensic science determination of how or why he suddenly died?

Is it “racist” to comment against those Pakistanis who failed in their duty to keep a Scottish visitor of goodwill to Pakistan safe and well? It’s not “racist” is it?

PAKISTAN

Is Fernandez informed about the Islamic Republic of Pakistan having officially but secretly hosted a military safehouse for Osama Bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan, where he was hunted down by the CIA and killed by the U.S. Special Forces? (The BBC’s Panorama documentary “Secret Pakistan” (2011) reveals Pakistan’s culpability. VIDEO 4.9.1. TRANSCRIPT 4.9.2)

Is Fernandez informed about the Islamic Republic of Pakistan being a state sponsor of Islamic terrorism world-wide?

Will Fernandez comment against the Islamic Republic of Pakistan now? Is it “racist” to comment against Muslim countries like Pakistan which are state sponsors of Islamic terrorism? It’s not “racist”, is it?

PAKI FIRST MINISTER

“He started to post a lot when the First Minister, Humza Yousaf was elected.
He would say derogatory comments about the first minister.
"HE IS A PAKI BASTARD.”
                                         - David Fernandez”

The Accused uses the word “Paki” as short for “Pakistani” which nationality Humza Yousaf claims he is.

See the Accused's video "It's not "racist" to call Humza Yousaf a "Paki"- 


PAKIS BY NAME

On X, the name “Paki” is used by dozens if not hundreds of people for part of their own X user name or handle.

The left-hand side of the above page of “Paki”-names & handles is reproduced magnified below.

Are dozens, maybe hundreds of people on X using “racist” language by calling themselves “Paki” (short for “Pakistani” presumably)?

They are not using “racist” language about themselves, are they?

It’s not “racist” for us to call them by the same name - “Paki” - that they gave themselves, is it?

POLITICAL BASTARDS

The accused is a politically discerning Scot, demanding a high standard of legitimacy for those appointed to the job of First Minister of Scotland but the Accused was particularly disappointed as far as Mr Yousaf was concerned, preferring to describe him as the “First Muslim” than as a legitimate “First Minister”.

The Accused writing for his blog has questioned the legitimacy of a succession of First Ministers of Scotland, of course in robust criticism of their outrageous misgovernment of policing and justice, but also in economics criticism of the failure of Mr Yousaf and Mr Swinney to secure adequate Scottish Government borrowing powers to grow the Scottish economy.


Humza Yousaf and Shona Robison agreed to a bad deal Fiscal Framework Agreement with the UK government on 2nd August 2023, wrecking the Scottish economy and impoverishing Scots.

The word “bastard” is posted a lot on X - a dozen times every minute may be typical. (Yawn.) The word “bastard” is unexceptional on X; the exception is when someone foolishly complains to the police about the use of the word on X.

SPAIN EXPELS MUSLIMS

HE AND ALL THE PAKIS SHOULD BE DEPORTED."
He also said "CLOSE THE MOSQUES AND MAKE ISLAM A CRIME"
                                        - David Fernandez.

That reads like Fernandez has partially misquoted the Accused’s posts. The following accurate quotes of the Accused’s posts on X put the record straight.

Is Fernandez informed about the Explusion of the Moriscos from Spain by a decree of King Philip III in 1609? Between 1492 and 1610 alone, about three million Muslims left or were expelled from Spain.

Will Fernandez comment about the expulsion of Muslims from Spain?

Was Spain “racist” to expel the Muslims? Spain wasn’t a “racist” country for expelling the Muslims, was it?

Spain isn’t a “racist” country for not inviting or allowing the descendants of the expelled Muslims to return to Spain, is it?

UNSPORTSMANLIKE

I have tried reporting these comments to Twitter but it does not seem to have done anything about it.
                                        - David Fernandez.

X did not do anything about Fernandez’s reports of the Accused’s comments because the accused’s comments do not break any of the X site’s rules or terms of service.

Fernandez is the one who is negligent in “not seeming to have done anything” proportionate, such as using X’s feature to mute or block the accused’s account “@_Peter_Dow” so that no more of the Accused’s “@_Peter_Dow” posts would be presented to Fernandez while scrolling X.

Making a mountain out of a molehill, Fernandez has gone out of his way to do something exceptionally disproportionate - complaining to the police about democratic comments - the political equivalent of a footballer diving in the penalty box in a dishonest attempt to deceive the official to gain an unfair advantage, such as an undeserved penalty kick at goal.

David Fernandez was previously red-carded and sent-off for unsportsmanlike conduct - in 2000 playing for Airdrie and in 2009 playing for Kilmarnock.

THE HEART OF A PAKI

“On the 24th of March he said "BORN INTO ISLAM, RAISED AS A MUSLIM, THE HEART OF A PAKI".
                                        - David Fernandez.


"I felt like I had to call the police to inform them because he is saying these kinds of things everyday.”
                                        - David Fernandez.

While a million Scots on X haven’t felt any such compulsion to complain to the police about any of the accused’s 10K posts on X.

“I feel offended by all the comments that he is making.”
                                        - David Fernandez.

Fernandez seems to be an easily offended reader who refuses to choose the easy and democratic way to deal with his hurt feelings - for example, by muting or blocking the “@_Peter_Dow” account on X.

“Snowflake” is a term for someone with a tendency to have an emotional meltdown and who makes vexatious complaints for no good reason, which word “snowflake” does seem to fit Fernandez’s meltdown in this case very aptly.

"I am David Fernandez, and this is my statement in relation to the events of today provided to PC Spence on 16:12(pm) 30/6/2024.
On Sunday 30th June about 1300 hours I have been scrolling X as a guest."
                                        - David Fernandez.

It is not possible to scroll X as a guest. X will always prompt you to log in with your @ handle and password so that X provides you with a custom service, allowing you to scroll through only those posts which have been pre-filtered as per your settings telling X which other accounts you have previously muted or blocked because you don’t want to read posts made from that muted or blocked account again.

“I came across a post from Peter Dow https://x.com/_Peter_Dow that was posted on June 27th ...”
                                        - David Fernandez.

So Fernandez had still not muted or blocked the “@_Peter_Dow” account so while scrolling X, Fernandez was inviting the possibility to scroll a post of “@_Peter_Dow” into view.

“... that makes reference to Aberdeen's ballot paper stating with the caption.
CHOOSE YOUR SURRENDER MONKEY BECAUSE THERE'S NOT ONE OF THEM THAT WILL FIGHT FOR YOU UNLESS YOU ARE A MUSLIM WHO WANTS TO KILL WOMEN & GAYS FOR GOING AGAINST TRADITIONAL ISLAMIC VALUES. PAKIS OUT.”
                                        - David Fernandez.


MUSLIMS KILL WOMEN



MUSLIMS KILL GAYS

LGBTQ rights in Iran - Capital punishment

“That really alarmed me as I know it is not a one off from this person. I know this person resides at 21 Hollybank Place, Aberdeen.”
                                        - David Fernandez.

The evidence of Muslims killing women and gays should be alarming. It would be morally improper to be relaxed or indifferent about such barbaric cruelty.

But it would be inappropriate to be alarmed about the Accused’s actions or to fault the Accused in any way for dutifully commenting about this matter of genuine humanitarian concern.

If Fernandez is inappropriately “really alarmed” by the Accused’s comments then that is not the Accused’s problem, X’s problem, the police’s problem or the courts’ problem.

Fernandez’s irrational alarm is a problem for himself to deal with. Perhaps Fernandez should compose himself, relax, perhaps kick a football to divert himself from the stresses of reading X?

The Accused, X managers, the police, the courts all have better things to do than make a fuss over Fernandez’s irrational and unreliable witness statement.



Commenting and disagreeing with each other about the relative merits of candidates for election, as the Accused has quite properly done, is a vital part of a thriving democracy in action but is no reason for alarm.

Whereas Fernandez complaining to the police about the Accused for commenting democratically about the candidates in an election is Fernandez inciting a fascist police state attack against the democratic process.

Inciting fascism, attacking democracy is what the dictator Franco did in Spain before Fernandez was born.

Why has Fernandez aped the bad example of the old fascist Spain? Why does Fernandez not wisely follow the good example of the new democratic Spain?

CAUSE OF FREEDOM

Fernandez should learn right from wrong from The Scots Who Fought Franco - volunteers in the Spanish Civil War fighting for democracy and for the Spanish republic - fighting against the fascist dictator Franco.

The cause of freedom and anti-fascism has long been Scotland’s greatest cause. Today, Scots support the people of Ukraine resisting the fascist invasion of the Putin-misled Russian military.

Scots will dismiss Fernandez’s suggestion that the accused or anyone should ever not be allowed to discuss the relative merits of the candidates online and the policies of the parties etc. at election time.

To censor online debate around an election would be to rig that election to be even more in favour of the candidates already advantaged by support in the BBC and other mass media.

UNRELIABLE WITNESS

"I have had my statement read back to me and confirm it is true and accurate.
I can identify the accused."
                                        - David Fernandez.

This document has rebutted Fernandez’s witness statement to confirm that whilst the Accused’s posts were indeed as quoted by the defence above and similarly on other occasions, Fernandez’s complaint about those posts is unnecessary, dramatic, dishonest, malicious and unsportsmanlike.

This concludes the defence’s rebuttal of the Crown’s unreliable witness David Fernandez.

Thursday, 7 August 2025

I rebut false witness Darren Steadwood's misinformation, implicating Anas Sarwar with the Scottish Parliament's new Gestapo

 IN THE SHERIFF COURT OF GRAMPIAN, HIGHLAND AND ISLANDS

AT
ABERDEEN

REBUTTAL FOR THE ACCUSED
WITNESS - Darren Steadwood

in
Procurator Fiscal, ABERDEEN
against
ALASTAIR PETER DOW, B.Sc.(Hons)


SCS Ref: SCS/2025-003979
Local Ref: ABE/2025-000145
PF Ref: AB25000403-001
Police Ref: PSSECR53W1224
SCRO No: S129419/83N



Date  lodged -  7th August 2025
Lodged by the accused representing himself


DOCUMENT CONTENTS  

    • TITLE PAGE
    • DOCUMENT CONTENTS

    • REBUTTAL FOR THE ACCUSED

    • SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT

      • SECURITY REVIEW

      • CLAIRE BAKER MSP

      • ANAS SARWAR MSP

      • LYNSEY HAMMIL

      • GESTAPO OPERATIONS

      • DARREN STEADWOOD

      • UNRELIABLE WITNESS

REBUTTAL FOR THE ACCUSED

This document for the defence is produced to rebut the Crown witness Darren Steadwood, showing the unreliability of his witness statement to the police.


Unreliable Crown Witness - Darren Steadwood

SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT

The Scottish Parliament is an enhancement to the democracy of Scotland not a “replacement” for the democracy of Scots which we realise daily by exercising cherished democratic rights to freedom of expression, to speak, to publish, to organise, to hold to account the Members of the Scottish Parliament and Ministers of the Scottish Government and to criticise their policies and fitness, or otherwise, for high office.

SECURITY REVIEW

Following the murder of Sir David Amess MP in 2021 -

Sir David Amess MP (left) and his killer, Ali Harbi Ali, Islamic terrorist (right)


- when Sir David was stabbed to death at a constituency surgery by an Islamic terrorist - the Scottish Parliament Corporate Body (SPCB) undertook a review of the personal security provision for MSPs and staff.

One might expect that the review should have recommended beefed-up security arrangements at constituency surgeries, including security staff searching those meeting MSPs to ensure they are not carrying knives or other concealed weapons.One would not expect that a review would initiate a wholly inappropriate project to undermine the democratic freedoms of Scots - but sadly, a pilot to crack down on online freedom of expression was launched by the SPCB.


CLAIRE BAKER MSP

The Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body (SPCB) since 2021 has been convened by the Presiding Officer (Alison Johnstone MSP) and just 4 other elected MSPs - Jackson Carlaw MSP, Maggie Chapman MSP, Claire Baker MSP & Christine Grahame MSP.


Claire Baker MSP takes a lead interest in the SPBC portfolio of “Digital services, resilience and sustainability”, including presumably security.


Claire Baker MSP


Baker is an English Language and Literature graduate who worked as a researcher for the Scottish Parliament Labour Group, the trade union Amicus and the Royal College of Nursing and as the policy manager for the Scottish Council of Voluntary Organisations.

So Baker does not seem to be at all qualified nor sufficiently experienced to serve as Scottish Labour’s Shadow Cabinet Secretary for Justice (2016-2017) nor to be responsible now for the security of the Scottish Parliament, its MSPs and its staff.

Which rather begs the question of who would dare to trust the unqualified and clueless Claire Baker with such an important role? The answer is revealed when we note that Claire Baker is a Scottish Labour politician who nominated Anas Sarwar MSP for election as leader of Scottish Labour, who presumably returned the favour by supporting Baker for membership of the SPBC.

ANAS SARWAR MSP

Anas Sarwar MSP was born in Glasgow to Pakistani Muslim parents and at a meeting of Scottish Pakistanis, Sawar pledged to get real power for Pakistanis in Scotland inevitably by disempowering non-Pakistani Scots.


Anas Sarwar photographed with the then Pakistani consul at the Consulate for the Islamic Republic of Pakistan in Glasgow.

So when officials of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan suggest that Scottish Pakistani politicians should crack down on the democratic freedom of expression of Scots to criticise Pakistanis then Anas Sarwar, now as Scottish Labour leader, can tell his loyal supporter Claire Baker, a very useful idiot for Pakistanis on the Scottish Parliament Corporate Body, to mislead the SPCB to set up a project to do just that, disregarding the real security needs of MSPs and staff.

As plain as day, the arrest and prosecution of the Accused is a politically-motivated act - a witchhunt - orchestrated by Pakistani politicians like Humza Yousaf, Kaukab Stewart and Anas Sarwar.

It does not matter to Pakistan whether Scottish-Pakistanis are members of Scottish Labour or the SNP, so long as they serve the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, by opposing criticisms of Pakistan, Pakistanis and Muslims.

Anas Sarwar of Paki-Labour (left) shakes hands with Humza Yousaf of Paki-SNP (right).

LYNSEY HAMILL

Lynsey Hamill, is employed by the Scottish Parliament Corporate Body as Director of Operations and Digital, now, while previously her job there was Head of Sustainability and Resilience. Presumably then Hamill takes her policy lead from Claire Baker as SPCB lead for Digital services, resilience and sustainability.


So when Baker, seeking to please Sarwar, tells Hamill, in effect, to target social media critics of Pakistanis taking power in Scotland and in their wake Pakistani grooming gangs, Pakistani-organised crime and Pakistani-organised Muslim terrorism, by setting up a social media monitoring scheme to report such critics to the police then targeting such a critic as the accused, Alastair Peter Dow, is, in effect, the sort of operation that Hamill has been tasked to do, by Claire Baker MSP and the Scottish Parliament Corporate Body, of course, but behind Baker is the Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar MSP, behind him is the Pakistani diaspora and behind them all ultimately is the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.


“Given the scale of potentially criminal content identified online, it’s reasonable to assume more court cases will follow in the weeks and months ahead.” - Lynsey Hamill

GESTAPO OPERATIONS

“You tweet, the police will smash your door in and take you political prisoner”


The SPCB social media monitoring scheme is a fledgling Scottish Parliament secret police tasked to trawl social media sites to hunt down any Scot who dares to tweet an adverse comment about our “perfect” (sarcasm) MSPs.


This is the beginning of a Scottish Parliament Gestapo. It is an extremely dangerous development towards fascism, which is like a knife being held by politically-motivated secret police to the throats of Scottish democrats.

Now that this scheme for social media monitoring and reporting of fake, politically-motivated complaints to the police has been established at the Scottish Parliament, -

"An initiative by the Scottish Parliament has employed two members of staff – one a former police inspector – to trawl the social media accounts of 69 MSPs who signed up to the review.


The pair found 23,507 posts considered abusive in 2024-25, but which did not reach the required level to be considered criminal.


In the most recent year, 257 posts were referred to Police Scotland – down from 461 the previous year – with one case proceeding to court.


The Scottish Parliament’s monitoring software searches social media for threatening and abusive language and can refer the posts to police if required.


A briefing sent to MSPs by Holyrood’s director of operations and digital, Lynsey Hamill, said: “Whilst it is too early to draw any firm conclusions on trends and success of the scheme when comparing data from the pilot year and year one, we can see the scale of online abuse of MSPs is now readily apparent and growing." - The National


- what is to stop foolish MSPs from wasting still more police & courts time and resources by growing a fully-fledged Scottish Parliament Gestapo so that, not just 1 or 2 cases per year proceed to court, but so that eventually 20,000 or more Scots are arrested and imprisoned for doing our political duty to post on social media as per our conscience requires us to do as patriotic Scots, even if some easily-offended individuals assume our posts to be “abusive”?

Hitler believed that all his German critics were “offensive and abusive” and deserving of being taken as political prisoners but that didn’t justify what the Nazi Gestapo did to destroy German democracy.

But this is not German influence which is trying to set up a Scottish Parliament Gestapo - this is Pakistani influence. Scots must not allow the Pakistanis and their useful idiots at the Scottish Parliament to go any further down the road towards a Scottish Parliament Gestapo.

The Scottish Parliament Gestapo is intended by the Pakistani diaspora to act in the interest of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, which already has its own version of the Nazis' Gestapo and the SS - the Pakistani military’s Inter Services Intelligence - the ISI - responsible for co-ordinating Islamic terrorist organisations like the Taliban and Al Qaeda and sponsoring terrorist and political takeover operations world-wide.

The seal and state emblem of the Pakistani military Inter Services Intelligence, now running Pakistan behind the scenes of the window-dressing of a weak Pakistani democracy, now running Afghanistan via its control of its secret agents, the Taliban, now running London via its control of its secret agent London Mayor Pakistani Sadiq Khan, recently running the whole of the Scottish Government via its control of its secret agents the former First Minister Pakistani Humza Yousaf MSP and the (still) Minister for Equalities Pakistani Kaukab Stewart MSP and now running the fledgling Scottish Parliament Gestapo via its control of its secret agent Scottish Labour leader Pakistani Anas Sarwar MSP and his Labour Party supporter Claire Baker MSP, the lead member for security on the Scottish Parliament Corporate Body.
- Inter-Services Intelligence Activities in the United Kingdom.


DARREN STEADWOOD


Darren Steadwood plays Call of Duty


Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 PC: "Fallen Angels" - Enemies Pakistani ISI

Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) is an Evil Organization in Call of Duty, Black Ops 2, Fallen Angels mission and the ISI can get up to evil at the Scottish Parliament too by misdirecting Darren Steadwood to report social media critics of Pakistan and Pakistanis to the police.

Darren Steadwood is one of the two members of staff employed by SPCB to trawl social media accounts under the misdirection of Lynsey Hamill and under the political control of Claire Baker controlled by Anas Sarwar on behalf of the Pakistani diaspora and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, maliciously to misinform the police thereby to undermine the security of Scotland’s democracy.

The defence can now proceed to quote and then to rebut the statement to the police by this most unreliable Crown witness - a Misinformation and Insecurity Officer for the Scottish Parliament Gestapo.

Witness 1 - Darren Steadwood. STATEMENT 

"My name is Darren Steadwood and I am employed at the Scottish Parliament as an Information Security Analyst. I have worked in the role since June 2024. My duties include monitoring the social media accounts of Members of the Scottish Parliament for posts and messages which are offensive, threatening or motivated by hate. In order to carry out this role, I use a software tool called COSAIN, which proactively searches social media platforms for key words or phrases within posts, based on parameters set by me. I then read the posts, make my own assessment and if I deem it to be necessary, report the post to the police.

Between the hours of 09.00 and 17.06 hours on Tuesday 3rd December 2024, whilst reviewing the posts highlighted by the COSAIN software tool, I observed a post by @_Peter_Dow, which had been pla… on the Scottish government X account “@ScotGov”. I perceived this post to be directed towards Kaukab Stewart who I am aware is the Minister for Equalities of Scotland, and is of Pakistani descent, as the post was in reply to a picture of Kaukab Stewart that was posted on the Scottish government X account. I found the post to be offensive and racist in nature as it states -

‘Close the Pakistani consulate in Glasgow, deport the diplomat.’
‘Close the mosques, deport the imams,’

‘Tackle Islam’s violence against women and girls.’

‘The Paki SNP are the Taliban’s useful idiots in Scotland.’

I find the term ‘PAKI’ a particularly derogatory and racially offensive term and find the tweet to be disrespectful towards Pakistani people.


I have provided Police with a screenshot of this post and completed the relevant certification and identification documents in respect to this. I understand it will be referred to as LABEL NO SCREENSHOTS - @_PETER_DOW - 03/12/2024.

I cannot identify the accused.

I can confirm that this statement is a true and accurate record.


Signed Darren Steadwood


UNRELIABLE WITNESS

What a snowflake this Darren Steadwood has shown himself to be, assuming as a reader that he is entitled to misconstrue and to misrepresent what the Accused means when typing the word “Paki”.

Meaning is imparted by the writer and whilst any reader may attempt to comprehend what a writer’s words mean, a reader should not presume to attribute “racism” and start barking up the wrong tree on the basis of one misunderstood tweet.

Close the Pakistani consulate in Glasgow, deport the diplomat.
Close the mosques, deport the imams.
Tackle Islam's violence against women and girls.
The Paki SNP are the Taliban's useful idiots in Scotland.
https://peterdow.wordpress.com/2022/12/23/joanna-cherry-the-talibans-useful-idiot-and-kings-counsel/

#16DaysOfActivism #16Days




“Paki” is etymologically a shortened form of the word “Paki-stani” and that’s all the Accused means by the term “Paki” - “Pakistani”.

There is no “racist slur” intended by the Accused’s use of the term “Paki” here, nor elsewhere, as is explained at length in the “MEANINGS” section of the “Minute for the Accused”.

“Fact. The Islamic Republic of Pakistan is a country, not a "race". Pakistani is a nationality / national identity, not a "race". Islam is a religion, not a "race".
The accused's criticisms of Pakistan, Pakistanis, the Pakistani diaspora, Islam or Muslims do not feature unscientific notions of "race" in any shape or form.”

The Islamic Republic of Pakistan and Pakistanis are secretly supporting the Taliban and other Muslim terrorists worldwide, disrespecting and killing non-Pakistanis and non-Muslims. See - the sections “TERROR TARGETS” and “SECRET PAKISTAN” in the “Minute for the Accused”.

The BBC's "Secret Pakistan" (2011), 2 minutes introduction to a 2-hour documentary

We are not obliged to respect any country or nation which disrespects and tries to kill us, not even when snowflakes like Steadwood complain to the police about our disrespectful tweets.

RESPECT IS EARNED

Respect is earned, as it was when a schoolgirl named Malala Yousafzai defied the Taliban who shot her in the head for her courage.

RESPECT IS EARNED - MALALA YOUSAFZAI

Malala Yousufzai - Free Pakistan - Kill the Taliban (Video - 2012)

Just as respect was earned when the former Prime Minister of Pakistan Benazir Bhutto defied the Islamic militants and was then assassinated for her courageous patriotism.


Benazir Bhutto (21 June 1953 – 27 December 2007) was a Pakistani politician and stateswoman who served as the 11th prime minister of Pakistan from 1988 to 1990, and again from 1993 to 1996. She was the first woman elected to head a democratic government in a Muslim-majority country. Ideologically a liberal and a secularist, she chaired or co-chaired the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) from the early 1980s until her assassination in 2007.


KAUKAB STEWART

“I perceived this post to be directed towards Kaukab Stewart who I am aware is the Minister for Equalities of Scotland, and is of Pakistani descent” - Darren Steadwood

The defence questions what relevant facts about Kaukab Stewart is Darren Steadwood aware or unaware of?

Not only is Kaukab Stewart of Pakistani descent but she is an agent for the Islamic Republic of Pakistan who deliberately misleads the Scottish Parliament with Pakistani propaganda and Pakistani lies, hiding the terrible truth about the Islamic Republic of Pakistan’s support for Islamic terrorism world-wide and about Pakistan’s dependency on foreign aid while Kaukab Stewart supports the setting up of a new Scottish Parliament Gestapo to direct a crackdown on democratic freedoms of Scots to hold Pakistanis and Pakistan’s useful idiots to account.

VEXATIOUS COMPLAINER

Darren Steadwood's statement is not reliable evidence of racism nor of any criminality on the part of the Accused.

Steadwood is shown in this document to be an unreliable witness whose statement does not constitute prima facie evidence for reasonable suspicion of any criminal offence.

Steadwood’s statement is not proof of anything beyond that he is the sort of snowflake and vexatious complainer to the police which Anas Sarwar, Claire Baker and the Pakistani diaspora wanted the SPCB to hire because, as such, Steadwood could be relied upon to make false complaints for politically-motivated and malicious reasons. 

Steadwood should either be dismissed from the employment of the Scottish Parliament Corporate Body altogether or perhaps redeployed to a non-Gestapo role and actually perform a useful security role such as searching visitors to the Scottish Parliament for concealed weapons - perhaps to reveal timely information that is actually competent and relevant to the personal security of MSPs and staff.

This concludes the defence’s thorough rebuttal of Darren Steadwood’s unreliable witness statement.